The Italian foreign minister criticized the West who do not want to deal with Hamas. "It is a popular force that won democratic elections, with this attitude is a gift to Al Qaeda, Judgement today in the columns of Corrierone. He adds that "with the boycott the West does not give an extraordinary display of democracy. " Well. Let's start from the beginning with a clarification: even the Nazis rose to power through democratic elections. We know that democratic procedures are not enough to create institutions democreatiche. But we want to take up the challenge of D'Alema and ask that the West (or accident) refers. Why in the powder is not with the dialogue that we can solve anything. D'Alema and Fassino say that sitting at a table is already a recognition between the parties. They use a language useful for bargaining or the Levantine palaces of Rome that is little related to reality. Hamas may also come to the table but its stated aim is to wipe out Israel. Today is a less pretentious goal of a time as the Pax Americana in the Middle East, Asia and the alternative is shaky is around the corner. Just being able to wait. If this was the view then D'Alema had a hundred, a thousand reasons to bog down dialogue on tables useless and dangerous. Why dangerous? Because when and whether a contractor coffin - takes violent action, for example - you pay a price in credibility than your country and weaken the cause "moderate". Each opening European Union, including formal, but simply in the guise of political understanding, is likely to fuel the belief that there are allies along the path of violence. Regardless of the correct behavior or unfair. Massimo D'Alema is the son of a cultural tradition that makes the "reason of state" the quintessence of politics, even in foreign affairs. Untie the ethics of the people from the States and does not judge the behavior to occur such as trivial. The United States from Jefferson to Wilson - with the exception of Theodore Roosevelt - Clinton and Bush Jr does not distinguish the moral development of individuals from the States, both must be judged by a unique perspective. Prove to be as children of a democratic culture more mature, less oligarchic and less dusty than that distinguishes many European chancelleries and the Foreign Ministry. The model characterizes the Anglo-American diplomacy in part because Israel also shares an important ethical array of cultural origin (many of these issues are discussed in the book "Defending the West 'Liberal Editions Pierre Chiartano with a preface by Renzo Foa). This double standard, which involves a double-talk, causing massive damage and extraordinary misunderstandings. If caliamo this reality in the already complicated situation in the Middle East mess is served. We do not doubt the "seriousness" of Hamas, but also add that the Nazis were the SS were "serious and honest" pace of the bizarre law that D'Alema in "his" West.
http://difesadelloccidente.blogspot.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment