the interesting controversy on the evil teachers - is permissible, desirable and useful dialogue with the Islamist intellectuals? - Lacked the long list of names already intervened in the confrontation of ideas, André Glucksmann (Corsera 09/19/2007). One of the few French intellectuals took to the field to defend the first Benedict XVI in Regensburg, then the poor Redeker. The contribution was instrumental in systematizing and give the shirts to the teams in the field. The positions of the West have no small difference. In practice Glucksmann, the fighters are divided into the Western camp in agnostic, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali - Somali-Dutch origin protected in the United States - expressing a secular pride with a degree of intolerance equal to that of radical Muslims. For this school of thought every religion is the enemy of modernity. In France our counts Pascal Bruckner in this team. Then there are the intellectuals of Anglo-Saxon tradition (Ian Buruma and Timothy Garston Ash) who may not consider the "Age of Enlightenment fundamentalists" can turn to the good comparison. It is "confrontation" with respect to a fundamentalist vision of man, by both parties, it would seem. This culture-related Glorius Revolution, who managed to change society at the time, with no violent tendencies Jacobin, never put God out of history and modernity has never linked the redemption of religion. The integrationist model multicultural English - now in crisis - is something very different from the kind since the French "Conseil francais du culte Muslims," \u200b\u200bcreated by Sarkozy, pointed to the model of "citizenship believer." "C'est dans la République a place" that given to Islam, according to the new President is confident that the Islamic culture could simply be rimetabolizzata sauce "Republicain. Well, Glucksmann Anglo-Saxon approach leads to the red herring of a clash of civilizations. For the French philosopher, agnosticism and secularism against the Community Volterra model - the latter point very sorry for the keeping of République - still works fine. In France, perhaps it could still be useful, we would add, if it was not the flip side of religious fundamentalism. Because the comparison is between two different anthropological models. Looking ahead, the Greek polis would replace the Islamic madina. Glucksmann where we feel that captures the spirit of the times, and evaluation of the phenomenon of terrorism, "when a man blows himself up in a crowd, crime is human, too human," and the feedback for a class d ' intellectuals, "beautiful souls" with their ethical indefferentismo "too inhuman." At stake there would be a clash between cultures or civilizations, but the war between 'freedom and slavery. "
http://difesadelloccidente.blogspot.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment